Silvergate ex-CEO blames Biden pressure for bank’s 2023 wind-down
Reported by Cointelegraph · AI-assisted summary by ChikoCorp AI News Desk

AI-generated summary based on the linked source; not independently verified. This is not investment advice. Verify market-moving details at the original publisher before acting. See our editorial policy, AI content policy, and financial disclaimer.
Summary
Former Silvergate Bank CEO Alan Lane argues that political and regulatory pressure from the Biden administration forced the crypto-focused lender to voluntarily wind down its operations in 2023, despite the bank remaining solvent after substantial deposit withdrawals. Lane described the wind-down as a response to a “coordinated attack” by the administration, contrasting with federal findings that attributed the liquidation primarily to financial risks and governance issues.
Why it matters
Lane’s statements add a direct perspective to ongoing debates about whether U.S. regulatory agencies deliberately sought to limit crypto companies’ banking access. The source does not elaborate on the broader market or policy implications of this claim beyond presenting it as part of this discourse.
Key context
Silvergate suffered a 68% drop in digital asset deposits in the fourth quarter of 2022 and recorded significant losses from asset sales. Federal regulators identified concentrated crypto deposit reliance, funding risks, and governance weaknesses as key factors in the bank’s failure. In 2024, the SEC charged Silvergate and executives with misleading investors about AML controls, while the Federal Reserve fined the bank $43 million for deficiencies, highlighting regulatory scrutiny on its operations.
Key numbers and entities
Alan Lane (former CEO), Biden administration, Silvergate Bank, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal Reserve Board’s Office of Inspector General, Kathleen Fraher (former chief risk officer), $1 million SEC penalty, $43 million Federal Reserve fine, $11.9 billion to $3.8 billion drop in crypto deposits, $5.2 billion in debt securities sold, $718 million loss on sales, $4.6 billion cash and equivalents at year-end.
What remains unclear
The source does not clarify specific actions taken by the Biden administration that Lane considers political pressure nor detailed evidence supporting his claim of a coordinated attack. It is also unclear how regulators respond to Lane’s allegations, and the broader industry impact of these events remains unspecified.